On 10.11.2014 11:22, Stuart Rossiter wrote:
> Personally I'd prefer if people used the JavaHL APIs from the
> namespace. They're far better maintained.
> So is that a "won't fix since package is deprecated"? Do you want me
> to raise a bug report in any case for tracking purposes (or in case
> you might flag it as a very low priority fix)?
I think this is the second time I saw a complaint about a bug in the
org.tigris JavaHL API in 1.7+ ... so I guess the priority was just
raised from "no priority" to "low priority". :)
I'll see if I can fix it, but don't expect fixes anytime soon, and
especially don't expect another 1.7 release with any such fixes
backported. It might happen, but I make no promises.
P.S.: BTW, I saw your note about "of course should be using SVNKit" over
on StackOverflow. Apparently, SVNKit is not very actively maintained; it
doesn't even implement all 1.8 features yet (and even basic working copy
compatibility with that version took 6+ months to arrive), and AFAIK
there aren't likely to be any 1.9-related updates. And it's much slower
Received on 2014-11-10 12:02:01 CET