[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Time to branch 1.9

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 09:04:11 -0800

On Nov 7, 2014, at 6:57 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrmann_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> My side of the bargain has been trying to think of unnecessary
> restrictions that FSFSv7 might have and then to fix them. It
> started with performance in "unmanaged" setups, continued
> with support for heterogeneous clusters and currently ended
> with defined behaviour after hot upgrade. I also "shot bullets"
> at repositories to see whether random corruption could sneak
> past our consistency checks. And I will continue testing more
> and more scenarios.
> -- Stefan^2.

I just want to say that while my personal belief is that we should largely leave fsfs alone, I do appreciate from an engineering perspective the amount of effort you have put in to trying to make this code bullet proof and also to measure the improvements.

I think you have done about as much and as well as one person can.

Received on 2014-11-07 18:06:57 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.