On 27.10.2014 18:45, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 10/26/14 11:35 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> The fact that the svn:mime-type property is usable in any way for
>> serving content from the repository is more or less an accident; it's
>> definitely not a design goal. What you propose would have zero benefit
>> for Subversion as a version control system but less than trivial
>> maintenance costs, so it's not likely to ever happen.
> I agree splitting up well known parameters of the Internet Media Type into
> standard "svn:" namespace properties seems not terribly useful to me.
>
> I don't think the choice of storing a mime-type rather than just a boolean for
> binary data vs not-binary is a happy accident. Pretty sure we stored a
> mime-type because we figured it would be useful for other things than just
> distinguishing binary types. But as I recall you're the one that came up with
> the svn:mime-type property in the first place. So maybe you have a better
> recollection than I do about this.
Frankly, IIRC I had rather naïve expectations about the usefulness of
MIME-type for detecting "binaryness". Or, more precisely, the ability to
diff/merge. One of the considerations at the time was also to have the
ability to add diff/merge handlers for content other than line-based
plain text (XML merge was probably at the top of the list at the time).
Turns out we've never actually bothered doing that (yet).
-- Brane
Received on 2014-10-27 22:57:38 CET