[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Pool usage in Python bindings

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 09:40:40 +0100

Alexey Neyman <stilor_at_att.net> writes:

> PS. I use svn_ra_session_t as an example where a semi-permanent
> allocation is necessary. However, I couldn't find the interface
> that destroys/closes the svn_ra_session_t. Is it correct that the
> svn_ra_session_t is always destroyed by destroying the corresponding
> session pool?

Yes, and that a pattern is also used in other places, e.g. svn_fs_t. 

-- 
Philip Martin | Subversion Committer
WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
Received on 2014-10-08 10:41:19 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.