On 09/22/2014 12:13 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Yup. So let's say we can agree to hide this behaviour at the repos layer. Then we face the decision of what to do with the FS layer:
>
> * make FS layer consistently version no-ops
> -- a lot of work at FS layer
> -- some work at repos layer
>
> * make FS layer consistently not version no-ops
> -- some work at FS layer
> -- no work at repos layer
>
> * leave FS layer as it is, partially implemented
> -- no work at FS layer
> -- some work at repos layer
>
> Which approach would you favour, and why?
"make FS layer consistently not version no-ops" stands in opposition to
the historical intent for the FS layer. The other two options are fine
with me, though I confess that at this stage of the game, trying to
retroactively consistify the FS layer's behavior without a driving
use-case beyond mere developer OCD seems like a waste of time of
energy. That said, it's neither my time nor energy at risk, so weigh my
input accordingly.
--
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
Received on 2014-09-22 20:41:04 CEST