Re: Moving some of our tools to "main" subversion
On 19 August 2014 15:34, Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrmann_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
> At the SHF hackathon, we talked what tools should be installed
> by default and which should be part of tools.
> We decided to make
> * svn-bench (reported as useful in the field) and
I agree that 'svn-bench' could be useful for users, but what is the
reason for non-standard naming? Why this tool is not named 'svnbench'
> * svnfsfs (disaster recovery tools should be available by default)
I doubt that 'svnfsfs' can be moved to "main" Subversion in the
current state because it uses internal library headers and functions
Have you considered this? What is about ABI/API issues? Note that we
never include such headers in current Subversion code except
"fs-loader.h" and tests.
CTO | VisualSVN | http://www.visualsvn.com
Received on 2014-08-26 14:12:14 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev