[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Moving some of our tools to "main" subversion

From: Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 16:11:27 +0400

On 19 August 2014 15:34, Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrmann_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
> At the SHF hackathon, we talked what tools should be installed
> by default and which should be part of tools.
> We decided to make
> * svn-bench (reported as useful in the field) and
I agree that 'svn-bench' could be useful for users, but what is the
reason for non-standard naming? Why this tool is not named 'svnbench'

> * svnfsfs (disaster recovery tools should be available by default)
I doubt that 'svnfsfs' can be moved to "main" Subversion in the
current state because it uses internal library headers and functions
from libsvn_fs_fs:
#include "../libsvn_fs_fs/index.h"
#include "../libsvn_fs_fs/pack.h"
#include "../libsvn_fs_fs/rev_file.h"
#include "../libsvn_fs_fs/util.h"

Have you considered this? What is about ABI/API issues? Note that we
never include such headers in current Subversion code except
"fs-loader.h" and tests.

Ivan Zhakov
CTO | VisualSVN | http://www.visualsvn.com
Received on 2014-08-26 14:12:14 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.