[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Regression in bindings? 1.7/1.8 vs 1.6

From: Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:02:47 +0400

On 12 August 2014 12:46, Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> writes:
>> The txn_dir_cache gets cleared when the pool associated with the
>> txn_root is cleared
> The net result is that the txn_dir_cache doesn't really work with
> apache/mod_dav_svn. Import a directory containing a large number of
> small files and the rate at which files are added slows as the number of
> file increases. For svnserve the rate remains more-or-less constant.
> The final stage comverting the transaction into a revision is much
> faster for svnserve than for apache/mod_dav_svn.
Hi Philp,

Ouch, it looks like the serious problem that could lead invalid data
committed to repository. Is it true? Did you already filed issue?

Ivan Zhakov
CTO | VisualSVN | http://www.visualsvn.com
Received on 2014-08-26 11:03:35 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.