[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1617088 - in /subversion/branches/svn-auth-x509: subversion/include/ subversion/libsvn_fs_base/ subversion/libsvn_fs_base/bdb/ subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/ subversion/libsvn_fs_x/ subversion/libsvn_subr/ subversion/libsvn_wc/ subversion/mod_da...

From: Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 00:26:55 +0400

On 10 August 2014 20:47, Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> On 10.08.2014 13:00, ivan_at_apache.org wrote:
> Author: ivan
> Date: Sun Aug 10 11:00:39 2014
> New Revision: 1617088
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1617088
> Log:
> On svn-auth-x509 branch: Revert r1616093 (svn_checksum_to_cstring_display2
> implementation) -- it's out of the scope of svn-auth-x509 branch and I
> develop local x509 implementation for formatting cert fingerprints.
> -1
> You started mucking with the branch, despite the fact that Ben has good and
> valid reasons against your proposed change, and the discussion (and vote!)
> on dev@ does not have a resolution yet.
Could you please add technical reason for your veto. Just referencing
Ben doesn't count. Ben could raise veto himself if he wanted, but
current state of our discussion is different view to name and purpose
of svn_x509_fingerprint_display() function.

> Please revert r1617088, r1617095 and r1617096.
I'm ready to do this, but I find it counter-productive because I'll
have to raise convert my vote to -1 on svn-auth-x509 branch merge in
situation when we actually doesn't have serious disagreement with Ben.

Ben, could you please let me know if you don't like directions of my
commits and want to have them reverted: I'll revert it immediately of

Ivan Zhakov
Received on 2014-08-10 22:27:44 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.