Re: svn commit: r1616696 - /subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS
On 8 August 2014 13:03, <stefan2_at_apache.org> wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Fri Aug 8 09:03:29 2014
> New Revision: 1616696
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1616696
> * 1.8.x/STATUS:
> Add r1615354 to r1611379 group and unveto the latter.
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS?rev=1616696&r1=1616695&r2=1616696&view=diff
> --- subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS Fri Aug 8 09:03:29 2014
> @@ -133,6 +133,22 @@ Candidate changes:
> +1: breser, philip
> + * r1611379, r1612405, r1615354
> + Fix revprop caching initialization delays for ra_serf on Windows.
> + Justification:
> + Without this patch, even small checkouts may take 20 to 40
> + seconds longer. This patch switches the named atomics SHM
> + initialization guard to the same "never delete the lock file"
> + pattern that we use for FSFS-internal locks.
> + Notes:
> + Branch is needed since SVN_VA_NULL is not available in 1.8.x.
> + Same goes for svn_io_file_create_empty.
> + Branch:
> + ^/subversion/branches/1.8.x-r1611379
> + Votes:
> + +1: stefan2
> + +1 (without r1615354): brane, breser
> * r1612225
> Ignore ENOTIMPL and EINCOMPLETE errors when tweaking temporary file
> permission bits on non-windows systems.
> @@ -169,22 +185,5 @@ Veto-blocked changes:
> the root cause is not fixed. Discussion:
> - * r1611379, r1612405
> - Fix revprop caching initialization delays for ra_serf on Windows.
> - Justification:
> - Without this patch, even small checkouts may take 20 to 40
> - seconds longer. This patch switches the named atomics SHM
> - initialization guard to the same "never delete the lock file"
> - pattern that we use for FSFS-internal locks.
> - Notes:
> - Branch is needed since SVN_VA_NULL is not available in 1.8.x.
> - Same goes for svn_io_file_create_empty.
> - Branch:
> - ^/subversion/branches/1.8.x-r1611379
> - Votes:
> - +1: stefan2, brane, breser
> - -1: ivan (Race condition and undefined behavior. See:
> - http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2014-08/0007.shtml)
Why did you remove my veto for this nomination?? Please add it back.
CTO | VisualSVN | http://www.visualsvn.com
Received on 2014-08-08 11:42:48 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev