[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Issues with bindings tests

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 17:38:04 +0100 (BST)

Ben Reser wrote:
> On 5/19/14, 3:11 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> ... Do you know why that "if" condition exists at
>> all? Why do we set the library path only if the library path variable is named
>> DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH or LD_LIBRARY_PATH -- are there some names for which we should
>> not do this?
>>
>>>    case "@SVN_APR_SHLIB_PATH_VAR@" in
>>>       DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH|LD_LIBRARY_PATH)
>>>         # append the required library paths to the variable
>
> The only reason we have to do that DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH dance is because we can't
> effectively use rpath on OS X (due to way rpath is implemented in the Mach
> executable format on OS X, which is outside the scope of this email thread).
>
> On platform's like Linux in this case, the rpath is functional for our
> purposes.  Adding a LD_LIBRARY_PATH hides the broken linkage, so it's
> undesirable (except as a last resort when we can't avoid it any other way).

Thanks for the explanation, Ben. I'll add your explanation to the Makefile snippet in question.

> Julian's fix is good enough in my opinion.  It solves the problem that is most
> likely to crop up, specifically the system installed libraries conflicting with
> the test.
>
> What it doesn't solve is a case where some other version of Subversion
> libraries in installed in a non-standard lib directory that also happens to be
> the directory you're using to get Serf or BDB.  But I don't see a way to
> actually fix this case and so I'd much rather see us leave this problem in
> place, because there is a real problem there.

Sounds good to me.

- Julian
Received on 2014-05-19 18:41:18 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.