Re: [PATCH] fix potentially undefined operation warning
From: Andreas Stieger <andreas.stieger_at_gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 18:24:18 +0100
> On 15 May 2014, at 15:49, Branko Äibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
I think he has. Further, the call is to svn__base36toui64() which, if I read correctly, uses the pointer as a return, e.g. in this case it does not matter whether the first parameter was incremented. Never versions of gcc might detect this and not warn?
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.