[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: svn commit: r1544690 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:libsvn_wc/status.c libsvn_wc/wc-queries.sql libsvn_wc/wc_db.clibsvn_wc/wc_db.h tests/cmdline/stat_tests.py

From: Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 09:01:08 +0200

Accurate is probably the best completion, as the old version missed a few corner cases that really needed more info from wc.db.


-----Original Message-----
From: "Ben Reser" <ben_at_reser.org>
Sent: ‎26-‎4-‎2014 03:48
To: "Subversion Development" <dev_at_subversion.apache.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1544690 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:libsvn_wc/status.c libsvn_wc/wc-queries.sql libsvn_wc/wc_db.clibsvn_wc/wc_db.h tests/cmdline/stat_tests.py

On 11/22/13, 1:49 PM, rhuijben_at_apache.org wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Fri Nov 22 21:49:46 2013
> New Revision: 1544690
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1544690
> Log:
> Fix a very ugly case in 'svn status' where 'svn status wc' and
> 'svn status wc/path' could show a different status for path.
> This also makes 'svn status' always describe the highest moved_to when
> there are multiple moves from a single location.
> (This behavior was undefined before, but identical to what you would get with
> the usual index usage in sqlite)
> This patch has the nice side effect that it resolves the most common crash
> report in the current AnkhSVN version: an assertion caused by an invalid
> move stored in wc.db.
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/status.c
> (read_info): Move this function into wc_db.c to allow using a lock and
> access to private apis.
> (assemble_status): Update caller. Update moved_to usage.
> (get_dir_status,
> get_child_status,
> svn_wc__internal_walk_status): Update caller.
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-queries.sql
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c
> (read_children_info): Set moved_here as documented: only for op-roots.
> Don't duplicate name for every higher layer.
> Hook moved_to information in a linked list, to provide users all move
> information.
> (read_single_info,
> svn_wc__db_read_single_info): New function. Based on status' read_info,
> but more


More what? Seems that part of that sentence is missing. Based on the context
I'm guessing more accurate?
Received on 2014-04-26 09:02:12 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.