[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1586391 - in /subversion/branches/thunder: BRANCH-README notes/thundering-herd.txt

From: Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 20:17:04 +0400

On 12 April 2014 00:01, Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrmann_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> It seems that the document in notes/ did not make it clear what
> the actual problem is and how it applies to Subversion servers.
> Let me try to illustrate it.

> Should these trends be confirmed for "real" HW, networks and ra_serf,
> I'd love to see this code in 1.9 - after due review and feedback.

Hi Stefan,

I got the idea from original description, but thank you for explaining
it one more time. Anyway my concerns are still valid and I am -1 on
implementing this at FSFS layer. Especially if we're going to release
Subversion 1.9 in 2014.

I'm also skeptical on FSFS full texts caching. I think that caching
worth only for small metadata, that doesn't consume a lot of memory
but expensive to build. But that's different story.

Ivan Zhakov
CTO | VisualSVN | http://www.visualsvn.com
Received on 2014-04-14 18:25:46 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.