Re: 1.9.0-alpha2 up for testing/signing
From: Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 09:09:29 -0700
On 3/19/14, 3:50 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
Agreed, no reason to hold up for the SASL issue. The https certificate thing
> Come to that, it seems over-the-top that we are waiting for as much developer sign-off on this *alpha* release as we require for a production-quality release. It's been validated by at least one Unix system and at least one Windows dev; that's enough for me. Just release it and get the wider testing under way!
It's still a release even if it's an alpha. Subversion's policy is 3 for
Nobody is obligated to do any specific testing in order to grant their vote.
Some people are not really going to be comfortable doing just the minimum. But
What those reasons are for not voting, I can't say but I suspect they fall into
* Environmental/Dependency issues (Windows is particularly prone to this
* Someone else will do it.
* Too busy.
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.