[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Subversion checked-out files not indexed in Windows search

From: Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:14:53 +0100

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:ivan_at_visualsvn.com]
> Sent: donderdag 13 maart 2014 13:56
> To: Branko Čibej
> Cc: Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: Subversion checked-out files not indexed in Windows search
>
> On 13 March 2014 16:46, Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> > On 13.03.2014 13:37, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >
> > On 12 March 2014 18:17, Gareth McCaughan
> > <Gareth.McCaughan_at_lightblueoptics.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >
> > It looks like serious issue. Could you please file issue in Subversion
> > issue tracker: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues
> >
> > Done. Issue #4478.
> >
> > Gareth, thanks a lot!
> >
> > It seems we have second reason to create temporary files in target WC
> > directory, instead of .svn/tmp. Another problem we had before is
> > inherited ACL on Windows discussed year ago:
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-
> dev/201309.mbox/%3C20130928110059.d1bb8d007dfe7b26cbcb4f719cb77fd6
> .be88925bf6.wbe%40email16.secureserver.net%3E
> >
> > I've prepared stupid patch to create temporary files in WC, instead of
> > .svn/tmp and it seems working fine.
> >
> >
> > -1. This leaves us with no reliable way to clean up the working copy in case
> > of an aborted operation.
> >
> > There should be a better way for managing ACLs on windows that does not
> > require us to mess up the working copy. I'm perfectly happy with just
> > documenting that we don't support different ACLs for .svn and the rest of
> > the WC, at least for now.
> >
> Please note that problem reported is not about inherited ACL: now
> users got NOT_INDEXED attribute on all WC files, because .svn marked
> to by not indexed by Windows Search and tools like that.

I'm working on a better patch for this, that doesn't have this problem and will improve performance on the pristine store operations as well.

But since when is this a huge problem? We applied this setting since 1.6 if I remember correctly... I'm more surprised that you didn't know about this?

        Bert
Received on 2014-03-13 14:15:40 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.