Re: svn_ra_get_file_revs2 vs. blame vs. FS API

A couple of clarifications.

Julian Foad wrote:
> And note that the doc string for svn_ra_get_file_revs2() explicitly says these
> false positives can be returned.

In fact it's not explicit, but it directs the reader to see svn_fs_history_prev() for a definition of "interesting revisions", and that function's doc string has a note that it doesn't guarantee there's any change of content.

>   -- (perhaps) a definite content comparison API: "has the content changed?"

I mean "is the content different?", in case that's clearer.

- Julian
Received on 2014-02-17 13:47:19 CET