Re: 1.9 issues

On 24.01.2014 18:20, Ben Reser wrote:
> 2) libsvn_client_mtcc_*: Should these exist at all or be moved to another
> library? This conversation died out.

I asked for this API to be marked experimental, and was ignored. I'm not
at all happy about that.

I'm going to take this opportunity to say -1 to having this in
libsvn_client. It's a layering violation. Instead, I propose we
introduce a new API module and library, svn_tools, that contains all the
various APIfied functionality from our command-line utilities (apart
from the svn client itself, of course). The MTCC API should be moved to
svn_tools. If we have APIs for svnversion, svnadmin, etc., that are not
already covered by the existing librararies, we should move them, too.

-- Brane

-- 
Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion
WANdisco // Non-Stop Data
e. brane_at_wandisco.com