Re: svn commit:r1555350-/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/mtcc.c
From: Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrmann_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 21:48:18 +0100
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl> wrote:
> Note that I don't disagree with the mtcc change/fix.
Well, as already pointed out, apr pools default to strict LIFO.
So, based on Brane's comments, I did some digging and found
Before that, I looked at how svn_fs_close_root would work on
The combination of both patches makes the original mucc
We only test extensively Subversion with short lived client tools and in
When did we have to "patch all cl tools"? The fact that the
OTOH, we always had the occasional pool lifetime issue
I'm mildly worried by the fact that apr pools are not thread-safe
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.