Re: Performance of "svn lock *"

On 12/17/2013 10:06 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Just piping in on this one point. POST is perfectly acceptable here,
> and is not in conflict with the DAV spec in the least. Just because we
> add a new route for locking/unlocked multiple paths (via POST) doesn't
> mean we'll stop supporting the DAV LOCK/UNLOCK one-path-at-a-time route.
> That's all the compatibility -- with old Subversion clients and generic
> WebDAV clients alike -- that we need to fuss with.

By the way, I have no fewer than *six* patches with various stages of
aborted attempts at this approach for this very problem. :-(
Received on 2013-12-17 16:22:26 CET