Re: Race condition in APR_DECLARE_LATE_DLL_FUNC() implementation

On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:05 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wrowe_at_rowe-clan.net>wrote:

> On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:01:05 +0100
> "Bert Huijben" <bert_at_qqmail.nl> wrote:
>
> > I think the dll load function should be converted to a more stable
> > pattern, that properly handles multiple threads. And perhaps we
> > should just assume a few more NT functions to be alsways there
> > instead of loading them dynamically.
>
> This is possible with the 'mandatory' call to apr_init, but I think the
> existing pattern should persist for those who don't like to call the
> initialization logic.
>

We currently call apr_initialize() before spawning threads or doing
anything other APR. What else do we need to become thread-safe
under Windows?

-- Stefan^2.
Received on 2013-12-06 16:45:46 CET