[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1547873 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/sqlite.c

From: Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 09:28:30 -0800

On 12/5/13 6:13 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> writes:
>
>> I think a hotcopy should be a drop-in replica in most respects,
>> so it can be used easily in case the original repository is lost.
>> If people want to change access permissions they should do so explicitly.
>
> I think hotcopy should respect umask.

I agree with Philip. Using a file as a template makes sense for normal
operation but hotcopy is not normal operation.

However, does it really matter? If we respect the umask while copying the
revision file and then we use the revision file as a template won't we get the
same results?
Received on 2013-12-05 18:29:08 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.