On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
> On 27 November 2013 19:56, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 08:06:33 -0500:
>>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>>> > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 21:17:11 -0500:
>>> >> I've gone ahead and updated, and casually tested, my published RHEL 6
>>> >> compatible RPM building tools with a new 1.8.5 tag at:
>>> >> https://github.com/nkadel/subversion-1.8.x-srpm/tree/1.8.5-0.1
>>> > Perhaps these should be linked to from http://subversion.apache.org/packages?
>>> I'd welcome that.
>> Well, go ahead and post a patch against the site source. (You're the
>> best person to write the prose description.)
> Beside of any arguments I find links to Github from Subversion
> [Binary] Packages page very confusing.
There are workflow reasons that I publish it this way. Way back,
Subversion used to include package building components in the
"contrib" subdirectory. I've not seen anyone trying to bring that
back, or set up a parallel "subversion-packaging" project. If there's
enough enthusiasm to re-introduce something like that, I'd be happy to
work with it.
Received on 2013-11-28 02:25:17 CET