Re: Warning for missing sentinel arguments

On 11/18/13 3:03 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> If no objections I'll commit tomorrow.

On further thinking I don't think SWIG should be excluded in this case. It
makes sense to exclude it from the SVN_DEPRECATED warnings with SWIG because we
expect the SWIG bindings to implement deprecated functions for compatibility
purposes. Same with SVN_EXPERIMENTAL, the warnings are there to discourage
people from using them but the bindings compile time doesn't really help for
that purposes.

However, with the sentinel case I'd say we very much do want to know if the
bindings are using such a function without providing an appropriate sentinel.
Received on 2013-11-19 01:07:45 CET