[ Changing subject because perhaps some more discussion might arise.
More below. ]
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Gabriela Gibson
> <gabriela.gibson_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
>> 2.) The delimiter:
>>
>> There appears to be some team miscommunication here -- afaik, the last
>> status was that danielsh asked me to implement the semi-colon, so this
>> is what you got^Whad :)
>>
>> Now I had a long think and realised there are other issues with
>> expanding that have the potential to be traps, and so, I removed the
>> ability to escape the delimiter and changed the syntax to look like
>> so:
>>
>> [[[
>> struct replace_tokens_tab
>> {
>> const char *delimiter;
>> const char *replace;
>> } tokens_tab[] = { /* Diff terminology */
>> { "%svn_new_label%", label1 },
>> { "%svn_old_label%", label2 },
>> { "%svn_base_label%", label3 },
>> { "%svn_old%", from },
>> { "%svn_new%", to },
>> { "%svn_base%", base },
>> { NULL, NULL }
>> };
>>
>> if (label3) /* Merge terminology */
>> {
>> tokens_tab[0].delimiter = "%svn_to_label%";
>> tokens_tab[1].delimiter = "%svn_from_label%";
>> tokens_tab[3].delimiter = "%svn_to%";
>> tokens_tab[4].delimiter = "%svn_from%";
>>
>> }
>> ]]]
>>
>> Rationale:
>>
>> this new syntax frees the commonly used 'fN' and 'lN' variable names and is
>> completely unambiguous, and also fairly unique. It's more to type, but much
>> less to worry about. Moreover it matches the
>> %custom_keyword% syntax for the props, which is new in SVN 1.8:
>>
>> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.8#custom-keywords
>>
>> The issue is that, if we allow escaping (which we need to do if we use
>> %f1 %f1% or ;f1 etc) it only is necessary because we're appropriating
>> common variable names or a shell character as part of the delimiter.
>
> On Windows, %X% expands to the value of the environment variable X.
> I.e. %PATH% yields the value of the PATH variable etc. Best to avoid
> it, I think.
>
> On the other hand, %PATH won't be handled specially by the Windows
> command shell, so that might be a good option.
>
> Also, the custom-keywords syntax that you referenced above is %r, %u,
> %b, ... not %r% etc.
>
> So I think %X is better for your invoke-diff-cmd syntax.
>
> There's one caveat with this syntax on Windows though: it seems you
> cannot escape the percent sign at the end of a variable (at least, it
> doesn't work on my Windows XP under cmd.exe): if the value of X is
> foo, then %X%% will just expand to foo%.
>
> So if you go for the %X syntax, it might not be possible to give the
> user a guaranteed way to output
>
> the_old_label%
>
> as one of the invoke-diff-cmd arguments.
OK, a little googling helped here [1]. It seems the caret (^) can be
used to escape the percent sign:
[[[
C:\>echo %PATH^%
%PATH%
]]]
I wouldn't want to use the caret all the time, so I still think the %X
syntax is slightly better. And if needed, Windows users can still
escape any percent signs that confuse the shell (for instance if they
absolutely want a trailing percent sign after one of your variables).
BTW, it's not just "trailing percent signs" that can become a problem
with the %X syntax, it's also that the "beginning percent sign" of one
variable can be seen by the shell as the trailing percent sign of
whatever came before. Indeed, it seems that environment variables can
have spaces:
[[[
C:\>set A =blah
C:\>echo %A %foo
blahfoo
]]]
But perhaps we shouldn't worry too much about users setting the
environment variable with name 'svn_old ' :-).
[1] http://superuser.com/questions/409546/escaping-s-in-file-folder-names-at-the-command-line
--
Johan
Received on 2013-10-29 00:16:27 CET