Re: Move using initial state
From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 16:07:14 -0500
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com> wrote:
It is striking a balance between atomicity, and combinatoric growth.
(iow, we can skip the Second System Syndrome and get stuff done,
I don't think it poses a serious problem. But yeah... if it does, then
Don't forget the symlink variants!
> Yup. Alternatively, we could make 'alter' the *only* way to declare a node's content:
And now you lose much of the atomicity.
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.