[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Move using initial state

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 14:00:06 -0500

On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Philip Martin
<philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> writes:
>> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Philip Martin
>> <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>>> again either invalid or switched. This implies that if we want to
>>> combine
>> They are already combined. One person is trying to *decombine* them
>> into separate non-atomic unknown-duration actions.
> Two people at least. I have shown how Ev2 with a split move could
> handle the case
> A/B/C to A
> A/B to A/B
> A to A/B/C
> What is your alternative?

move(A/B/C_at_original, A, replace=R)
move(A/B_at_original, A/B)
move(A_at_original, A/B/C)

Not sure of the intent with children (ie. what is retained under A/B/C).

Received on 2013-09-06 21:00:38 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.