[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Move using initial state

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 17:20:48 +0100

Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> writes:

> This implies that if we want to
> combine
>
> move_away A, id=1
> move_here id=1, B
>
> into a single
>
> move A, B
>
> then move and alter need to be combined:
>
> move_dir A, B, children=, props=
> move_file A, B, checksum=, props=

I didn't mean to imply that children, props, checksum were NULL. It
would have been better if I had written:

       move_dir A, B, children=..., props=...
       move_file A, B, checksum=..., props=...

I suppose we could allow

       move A, B

in cases where B is not altered, i.e. a short form for move_dir that
doesn't change children or properties, and a short form for a move_file
that doesn't change checksum or properties. That's probably not a
useful form.

-- 
Philip Martin | Subversion Committer
WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
Received on 2013-09-06 18:21:28 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.