Re: Move using initial state
From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 10:42:45 +0100
Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Apache subversion Wiki
At some point we have to create temporary locations and I suppose it
Given this example:
svn mv A X
or the equivalent:
svn mv A/B/C X
we have this set of Ev2 moves in some order:
move A, A/B/C
What is the correct order for these operations? I guess there may be
move A, A/B/C
and
move A/B/C, A
are valid. Or perhaps the alter_dir ordering rules exclude one?
What about alter_dir? I think the rule is that alter_dir on a directory
* - The ancestor of an added, copied-here, moved-here, or
It's not clear where alter_dir should occur w.r.t the moves in my
alter_dir ., children='A'
or final_state paths:
alter_dir ., children='A'
-- Philip Martin | Subversion Committer WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*Received on 2013-09-05 11:43:26 CEST |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.