[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Assertion in svn_uri_is_canonical

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:21:30 +0100

Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> writes:

> What is the canonical form of this?
>
> scheme://./
>
> Should we drop '.' to give:
>
> scheme:///
>
> or do we have to retain it as
>
> scheme://./
>
> and change svn_uri_is_canonical to allow a hostname '.'?

Another problem is

     scheme://[.]

which we currently canonicalize as

     scheme://[.%5D

and that doesn't look right either. 

-- 
Philip Martin | Subversion Committer
WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
Received on 2013-08-23 01:22:03 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.