Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 15:08:51 +0200:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 02:50:26PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > On 12.07.2013 13:54, 刘新星 wrote:
> > > Thank you for your suggestions!
> > >
> > > mod_ldap for performance improvement is a further consideration.
> > >
> > > Actually I want to add ldap support for mod_authz_svn most.
> > > As far as I can see, when we need ldap authentication, we would take
> > > these combination 'apache + subversioin'.
> > > Is it a good idea to move ldap.c from libsvn_subr to mod_authz_svn ?
> I think we should ensure that both svnserve and mod_authz_svn interpret
> the authz rule configuration file in the same way. If one supports
> ldap and the other does not, the authz rules files are not compatible
> between server implementations. Users should be able to switch between
> apache and svnserve without such problems.
There's already an incompatibility with section names, svnserve uses the
(--root=ARG)-relative path and mod_dav_svn uses the basename of the
That dofesn't excuse diverging them further, of course.
Received on 2013-07-12 17:05:49 CEST