[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Approve group? (was: svn commit: r1502108 ...)

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:54:39 +0200

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 01:52:07AM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> Hey all,
> I'd like to see us get this approved and applied to 1.8.x. My recent
> changes "should" remove danielsh's issue with the patch group.
> Regarding Ben's, I'd suggest: any additional change would build upon
> this group. Thus, since the darned group is getting pretty large, I
> think it would make sense to get it folded in.
> It provides *a* solution to the proxy/chunked issue. Is more work
> needed? Maybe. There isn't clear consensus yet. But again: this group
> is a necessary precondition to any further work anyways.

I'd like a tri-state setting for the http-detect-chunking option (yes,
no, auto) that defaults to "auto". That was the best suggested approach,
in my opinion. I don't think we should compromise interoperability for
performance concerns over a single HTTP request. Especially in a patch

If you're saying that we're going to ship 1.8.1 with a two-state option,
and ship a tri-state option in a later 1.8 release, I might be happy with
that. But I don't really understand why we're not going for tri-state
right now.
Received on 2013-07-11 11:55:54 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.