Re: svn commit: r1495419 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf: options.c ra_serf.h serf.c util.c
From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 23:43:17 -0400
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
Huh? We're compliant. Why aren't we?
> Yes, we've come across broken proxies any number of times; but the
From our perspective, somebody broke our communication to mod_dav_svn.
The proxy is not inherently busted, per the spec. But it certainly
> And it is definitely not OK to make our users collateral damage in a
I'm fine with the users argument. Never said otherwise.
I said, "I don't want the 99% to suffer at the hands of the edge
I can agree this is a regression. We run into regressions in every
I'm not really sure of the answer to that. But I think it's a fair question.
>...
Cheers,
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.