[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1501371 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util_error.c

From: Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_apache.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 01:48:44 +0000

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 09:13:07PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_apache.org> wrote:
> >>...
> >> So, I submit that your veto lacks a technical basis, and is therefore invalid,
> >> and has no standing.
> >
> > You do not get to make that decision. Certainly not unilaterally. If
> > you feel it is invalid, then your course of action is to bring it to
> > the PMC's private list. Make your case, and then the PMC can take a
> > vote to eject Bert from the PMC, thus making his veto non-binding.
> And I should add: you'll need to make a similar argument to the Board,
> since the PMC would merely be recommending removal. The Board passes a
> resolution (or other decision making process) to effect the actual
> removal.
> So yeah... you've got a rough hill to climb on this one :-)


A veto not accompanied by a technical reason is invalid. I am seeking
consensus on the dev@ list that no technical reason was given. No one
is going to strip anyone's bits.

Received on 2013-07-10 03:48:50 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.