David Schweikert wrote on Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 15:04:34 +0200:
> I was thinking that we could use something like a "svn update
> --readonly", where svn doesn't any check anything on the working copy,
> but just applies any changes committed since the last update.
That's a common scenario, for example it applies to:
so enhnacing the core to support it better is not a bad idea. I'm
not sure whether specifically svn update --do-not-crawl-the-disk is the
best way forward; Johan's suggestion of a broader users@ discussion
might lead to identifying a better solution.
 Disclaimer: y $OTHERWORK uses svnwcsub to manage >15GB of live web
sites (with wc's on local disk), so I have an interest here.
Received on 2013-07-04 22:33:13 CEST