[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Block BDB 6

From: Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 07:28:56 -0700

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de> wrote:
> Ben Reser wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:10:46 -0700:
>> Not sure how to really handle the Windows build. I guess we can just
>> add "60" if we test with it because we have no auto-detection, so
>> you're making a deliberate choice to select a 6.0 version. Maybe add
>> a warning to the stdout of gen-make.py when you choose to do so?
> I don't think we need to add a warning that a feature is used that
> requires a source code patch to be enabled.

I think you misunderstood what I meant.

The only argument I see against leaving "60" out of the allowed list
in the Windows build is that we haven't tested it. Once that changes
we should allow "60", when we do so we should also add a warning about
the licensing issues. I say this because Windows has no
auto-detection of dependencies and as such the version of BDB is
always deliberately chosen by the user.
Received on 2013-07-03 16:29:32 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.