On 01.07.2013 20:08, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Lieven Govaerts wrote on Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 19:44:24 +0200:
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org> wrote:
>>>> I know this is a holiday week for some people but I'd like to start
>>>> producing a 1.8.1 next Monday. So if everyone can look at the STATUS
>>>> file for 1.8.x and get any things they want in there I'll produce a
>>>> 1.8.1 tarball for voting sometime on Monday US/Pacific (UTC-7) time.
>>> Sounds good. I have kind of last track, do we need a new Serf release
>>> to fix some of the problems with ra_serf?
>> Yes we do, for NTLM support and the ssl tunnel authentication fixes.
> Do we need to block the 1.8.1 release on that release? Or can we
> release 1.8.1 and say "Upgrade to serf 1.2.2 when that is released"?
In my opinion it's OK to release 1.8.1, and just put in the release
notes that in order to fix those problems, one needs to build with
Serf-1.2.2 or later. I expect that most people can get along just fine
with Serf-1.2.1; and, as Greg pointed out, Serf bugs are not Subversion
bugs. There are a number of important fixes ready for 1.8.1 that do not
depend on Serf.
Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion
WANdisco // Non-Stop Data
Received on 2013-07-01 20:12:49 CEST