[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Kidney blame with relaxed older end bound

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 19:41:10 +0200

On 01.07.2013 19:36, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Thinking about the behaviour of 'svn blame -r 50:20 file_at_50':
>
> Right now, if I'm not mistaken, it wants 'file_at_5 -r 20' to exist. Johan
> suggested it should automatically round 20 up to the oldest revision in
> which the file existed, to enable, for example, 'svn blame -r 50:0' by
> analogy to 'svn log -r 0:50'.
>
> But what if the file existed in revision 10, got deleted in revision 11,
> and resurrected (by 'svn cp file_at_10 file && svn ci') in r30? What
> should the end of the blame chain be --- file_at_r30, file_at_r20, or file_at_r10?

I'd expect that to depend on whatever happens to be the peg revision in
the blame incantation. I can never remember what the default is in any
particular case.

-- Brane

-- 
Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion
WANdisco // Non-Stop Data
e. brane_at_wandisco.com
Received on 2013-07-01 19:41:47 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.