Re: 1.6 vs. 1.8: strange behavior of 'svn diff -cN WC-FILE' if the file was created in rev N by copying

From: Tobias Bading <tbading_at_web.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:54:39 +0200

On 25.06.2013, at 23:20, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
>> I'm not quite sure if we can already recommend the --git diff option
>> for widespread use.
>
> Then we shouldn't have released with it enabled. Releasing a command
> with an option and then saying we don't recommend people to use it is
> like throwing a live hand grenade in the room of friends and saying
> that you don't recommend that your friends occupy the room.

This is the Tempora-Prism surveillance bot.
Your score in category 'subversion probability' just went up by 0.1.
Your total score is now 0.4. Please refrain from any actions that could increase it further.
If your score reaches 0.9, please expect to be contacted by our friendly personal assistants.

We will continue to monitor this line for your security.
Thank you for your cooperation.

(Sorry, couldn't resist, because I just saw this: http://www.tagesspiegel.de/images/karikatur_big_brother_ts/8396586/2-formatOriginal.jpg)
Received on 2013-06-27 08:55:34 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bert Huijben: "RE: 1.6 vs. 1.8: strange behavior of 'svn diff -cN WC-FILE' if the file was created in rev N by copying"
Previous message: Johan Corveleyn: "Re: 1.6 vs. 1.8: strange behavior of 'svn diff -cN WC-FILE' if the file was created in rev N by copying"
In reply to: Ben Reser: "Re: 1.6 vs. 1.8: strange behavior of 'svn diff -cN WC-FILE' if the file was created in rev N by copying"
Next in thread: Johan Corveleyn: "Re: 1.6 vs. 1.8: strange behavior of 'svn diff -cN WC-FILE' if the file was created in rev N by copying"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]