Re: 1.6 vs. 1.8: strange behavior of 'svn diff -cN WC-FILE' if the file was created in rev N by copying

From: Tobias Bading <tbading_at_web.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 07:06:36 +0200

On 25.06.2013, at 23:20, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
>> I'm not quite sure if we can already recommend the --git diff option
>> for widespread use.
>
> Then we shouldn't have released with it enabled. Releasing a command
> with an option and then saying we don't recommend people to use it is
> like throwing a live hand grenade in the room of friends and saying
> that you don't recommend that your friends occupy the room.

LOL. I like your sense of humor, Ben.
Received on 2013-06-26 07:07:14 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Philip Martin: "Re: Ev2 as a move-aware editor"
Previous message: Tobias Bading: "Re: 1.6 vs. 1.8: strange behavior of 'svn diff -cN WC-FILE' if the file was created in rev N by copying"
In reply to: Ben Reser: "Re: 1.6 vs. 1.8: strange behavior of 'svn diff -cN WC-FILE' if the file was created in rev N by copying"
Next in thread: Johan Corveleyn: "Re: 1.6 vs. 1.8: strange behavior of 'svn diff -cN WC-FILE' if the file was created in rev N by copying"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]