[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Merging unrelated branches - release notes

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:38:15 +0100 (BST)

Daniel Shahaf wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 09:55:20PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
>> It's checked in 'svn' first, and if you call the client layer
>> directly then the requirement is still there but you'll get a
>> lower level error for it, [...]
>> (The check in 'svn' appears to have been removed in trunk already,
>> since branching 1.8.x, probably as part of efficiency improvements.)
> Are you talking about r1493424?  That revision is nominated for backport:
> * r1493424
>   Remove unnecessary check for branches ancestry from
>   command line client. All required checks are already performed in
>   libsvn_client.
>   Justification:
>     There is no reason to command line and third-party use different
>     codepath for ancestory checks. Simple performance fix.
> I voted +0 on that since I agree with the rationale that 'svn' should not
> perform validations that libsvn_client does (that avoids code duplication).

Yes, that would be it.  I've now voted for that as well.

- Julian
Received on 2013-06-20 23:39:08 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.