Re: Merging unrelated branches - release notes
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 09:55:20PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
>> It's checked in 'svn' first, and if you call the client layer
>> directly then the requirement is still there but you'll get a
>> lower level error for it, [...]
>> (The check in 'svn' appears to have been removed in trunk already,
>> since branching 1.8.x, probably as part of efficiency improvements.)
> Are you talking about r1493424? That revision is nominated for backport:
> * r1493424
> Remove unnecessary check for branches ancestry from
> command line client. All required checks are already performed in
> There is no reason to command line and third-party use different
> codepath for ancestory checks. Simple performance fix.
> I voted +0 on that since I agree with the rationale that 'svn' should not
> perform validations that libsvn_client does (that avoids code duplication).
Yes, that would be it. I've now voted for that as well.
Received on 2013-06-20 23:39:08 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev