[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Automatic tree conflicts resolution during svn update

From: Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:24:39 +0200

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 03:27:58PM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> I'd say, just edit the moved file with the incoming content, embedded
>> in conflict markers, just like what we do for text conflicts. That, I
>> think, would be as good as possible.
> That's basically what updating the move is doing anyway.
> I wouldn't want to apply the incoming changes to the moved file
> without also clearing the conflict marker.

But that's what we do with text conflicts if you postpone them. We
modify the working file (with conflict markers), and leave the
conflict in place. So why not do this in this case? The incoming
content is embedded in conflict markers.

Something like this:

<<<<<<< .mine
incoming line 1
incoming line 2
>>>>>>> .r2
the end

Received on 2013-06-12 17:25:31 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.