Re: Automatic tree conflicts resolution during svn update

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 01:34:37PM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> Can't we improve this? (not talking about emergency fixing 1.8.x, but
>> thinking longer term). Can't we put the incoming edits "somewhere", so
>> the user can do something useful (manually) with them? Perhaps put
>> them in the moved-file with conflict markers around them, like we do
>> for text conflicts?
>
> I believe that in the future we'll just update the moved-away files
> by default, without even asking the user. This way, the edit shows
> up in the moved-away file, just as it does now if the user chooses
> 'mine-conflict' at the prompt.

Okay, but doesn't "postpone" still needs to have a well defined
behavior (and probably "as good as possible"), even if only for
supporting the --accept=postpone command line option?

--
Johan