Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> danielsh_at_apache.org wrote on Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:29:35 -0000:
>> Author: danielsh
>> Date: Wed Jun 12 10:29:34 2013
>> New Revision: 1492134
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1492134
>> Log:
>> Add an XFail test for 'svn blame -r 3:1' (where 3 > 1).
>>
>> Not filing an issue since I plan to commit a fix soon.
What behaviour change are you planning for 'blame'?
I ask because I don't think it's obvious.
For example, it would be useful to have a mode that looks forward in time from a given revision, to find the *next* revision at which each line is changed after the starting revision. Is that the behaviour you are planning?
- Julian
> Update: Bert found a potential problem with peg revisions here that
> might require revving an RA API, so it'll take me longer to get to
> committing a fix than I planned.
>
> Current WIP patch:
>
> Index: subversion/libsvn_client/blame.c
> ===================================================================
> --- subversion/libsvn_client/blame.c (revision 1492120)
> +++ subversion/libsvn_client/blame.c (working copy)
> @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ file_rev_handler(void *baton, const char *path, sv
> /* Create the rev structure. */
> frb->rev = apr_pcalloc(frb->mainpool, sizeof(struct rev));
>
> - if (revnum < frb->start_rev)
> + if (revnum < MIN(frb->start_rev, frb->end_rev))
> {
> /* We shouldn't get more than one revision before the starting
> revision (unless of including merged revisions). */
> @@ -479,7 +479,8 @@ file_rev_handler(void *baton, const char *path, sv
> }
> else
> {
> - SVN_ERR_ASSERT(revnum <= frb->end_rev);
> + /* 1+ for the "youngest to oldest" blame */
> + SVN_ERR_ASSERT(revnum <= 1 + MAX(frb->end_rev, frb->start_rev));
>
> /* Set values from revision props. */
> frb->rev->revision = revnum;
> @@ -578,6 +579,7 @@ svn_client_blame5(const char *target,
> svn_stream_t *last_stream;
> svn_stream_t *stream;
> const char *target_abspath_or_url;
> + svn_revnum_t youngest;
>
> if (start->kind == svn_opt_revision_unspecified
> || end->kind == svn_opt_revision_unspecified)
> @@ -599,11 +601,6 @@ svn_client_blame5(const char *target,
> target_abspath_or_url, ra_session,
> start, pool));
>
> - if (end_revnum < start_revnum)
> - return svn_error_create
> - (SVN_ERR_CLIENT_BAD_REVISION, NULL,
> - _("Start revision must precede end revision"));
> -
> /* We check the mime-type of the yougest revision before getting all
> the older revisions. */
> if (!ignore_mime_type)
> @@ -674,8 +671,14 @@ svn_client_blame5(const char *target,
> We need to ensure that we get one revision before the start_rev,
> if available so that we can know what was actually changed in the start
> revision. */
> + SVN_ERR(svn_ra_get_latest_revnum(ra_session, &youngest, frb.currpool));
> SVN_ERR(svn_ra_get_file_revs2(ra_session, "",
> - start_revnum - (start_revnum > 0 ? 1 : 0),
> + start_revnum
> + - (0 < start_revnum && start_revnum
> < end_revnum ? 1 : 0)
> + + (youngest > start_revnum &&
> start_revnum > end_revnum ? 1 : 0),
> + /* ### pass MAX(start_revnum, end_revnum) as
> peg thru to svn_fs_revision_root() */
> + /* ### blame 5 fails. */
> + /* ### check svn_repos_get_file_revs2 tests. */
> end_revnum, include_merged_revisions,
> file_rev_handler, &frb, pool));
>
>
>> * subversion/tests/cmdline/blame_tests.py
>> (blame_youngest_to_oldest): New test, XFail.
>> (test_list): Run it.
>
Received on 2013-06-12 13:23:27 CEST