On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org> wrote:
> On 02.06.2013 04:07, Ben Reser wrote:
>> I was hoping someone else would weigh in here. But I guess not.
>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> You guys are over-thinking it. Simply state this format is ASF-wide
>>> and be done with it.
>> Okay but should we ask anyone before we go and start using something
>> like application/vnd.apache.pubsub+json? Daniel seemed to think we
>> shouldn't use the apache namespace without talking to operations.
Nah. As I mentioned elsewhere: these aren't created every day. I don't
see any real need to coordinate this stuff.
We could probably have a ASF-wide registration thingy somewhere. Maybe
in the same directory where we records ICLAs, CCLAs, software grants,
>> Yes assuming they were defined when Subversion was under the
>> Subversion Corporation. Interestingly they appear not to be
>> registered (at least they aren't on the IANA list).
> Yup; at the time, I got the impression that registration was not in fact
> strictly required; only useful.
> or even better,
> as the format of the notifications does not in fact imply any kind of
> publish/subscribe architecture. You could create a server which clients
Ooh. I like that one. +1
Received on 2013-06-05 01:21:57 CEST