On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 07:07:10PM -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> I was hoping someone else would weigh in here. But I guess not.
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > You guys are over-thinking it. Simply state this format is ASF-wide
> > and be done with it.
>
> Okay but should we ask anyone before we go and start using something
> like application/vnd.apache.pubsub+json? Daniel seemed to think we
> shouldn't use the apache namespace without talking to operations.
To clarify: the point here isn't to add red tape; the point is not to stomp on
a shared namespace. In "vnd.apache.pubsub", "Apache Pubsub" is neither a PMC
nor a product. If any PMC registers arbitrary unix names of things in a shared
namespace, the result would be confusing.
Anyway, wrt concerns raised so far, I'll mention a few more permutations:
application/vnd.svn-pubsub+json
application/vnd.pubsub-stream+json
application/vnd.svn-pubsub-stream+json
Received on 2013-06-02 04:48:46 CEST