On 19.05.2013 18:48, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:15:55AM -0000, gbg_at_apache.org wrote:
>> Author: gbg
>> Date: Sun May 19 10:15:55 2013
>> New Revision: 1484260
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1484260
>> Log:
>> Seperate variable declaration from assigment.
>>
>> * subversion/libsvn_client/diff.c
>> (set_up_diff_cmd_and_options): Seperate variable declaration from assigment.
>>
>> Modified:
>> subversion/branches/invoke-diff-cmd-feature/subversion/libsvn_client/diff.c
>>
>> Modified: subversion/branches/invoke-diff-cmd-feature/subversion/libsvn_client/diff.c
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/invoke-diff-cmd-feature/subversion/libsvn_client/diff.c?rev=1484260&r1=1484259&r2=1484260&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- subversion/branches/invoke-diff-cmd-feature/subversion/libsvn_client/diff.c (original)
>> +++ subversion/branches/invoke-diff-cmd-feature/subversion/libsvn_client/diff.c Sun May 19 10:15:55 2013
>> @@ -2465,7 +2465,9 @@ set_up_diff_cmd_and_options(struct diff_
>> /* old style diff_cmd has precedence in config file */
>> if (config)
>> {
>> - svn_config_t *cfg = svn_hash_gets(config, SVN_CONFIG_CATEGORY_CONFIG);
>> + svn_config_t *cfg;
>> +
>> + cfg = svn_hash_gets(config, SVN_CONFIG_CATEGORY_CONFIG);
> Why? This doesn't seem to serve any useful purpose (in fact, I think it makes
> the code harder to read).
Indeed, we tend to prefer the original form.
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
Received on 2013-05-19 19:04:50 CEST