On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 6:59 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> On 05/17/2013 10:55 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 17.05.2013 15:32, ivan_at_apache.org wrote:
>>>> --- subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS (original)
>>>> +++ subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS Fri May 17 13:32:56 2013
>>>> @@ -124,6 +124,14 @@ Candidate changes:
>>>> Votes:
>>>> +1: stefan2 (for 1.8.1)
>>>>
>>>> +* r1483781
>>>> + Fix FSFS repository corruption on power or network disk failure on Windows:
>>>> + http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-05/0245.shtml
>>>> + Justification:
>>>> + Repository corruption. Regression from 1.6.x
>>>> + Votes:
>>>> + +1: ivan
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Is this considered a blocker? Should we roll RC3 next week and restart
>>> the soak period?
>>
>> We should put this into 1.8.0 but I don't think it is a destabilizing
>> change so we don't need to restart the soak.
>
> I agree. Soak time extensions are tied to the complexity of the change, not
> the severity of the bug fixed.
>
I agree this change is pretty simple and actually it just reverts
Subversion to 1.6.x behavior, but there are other places with similar
issue and they may require more complicated fix. I'm working on them.
--
Ivan Zhakov
CTO | VisualSVN | http://www.visualsvn.com
Received on 2013-05-17 17:04:14 CEST