[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: With 1.8.0-rc1 DOA, shall we accept more approved backports?

From: Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 07:47:26 -0700

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:23 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> With 1.8.0-rc1 DOA, should we roll more of the 1.8.x/STATUS items into what
> will be rc2? There look to be quite a few that have "(1.8.1)" decorators on
> them, I assume because they aren't considered valuable enough to restart the
> soak process. But the soak is already restarted, so...
> Ben, can you give us a new (very near-term, please) deadline for backport
> approvals based on when you plan to cut rc2?

I'd actually cut an rc2 last night, but after I cut it my Internet
went out for 10 hours. Overnight you guys have approved some more
changes, so I'm just going to toss that tarball and roll based on a
newer rev.

As to your question my intention is to get an rc2 prepared for sure
today. I looked through the other items in STATUS. Only one has
sufficient votes and I've moved it to approved. Bert is working on
his API change to svn_utf_initialize2() and then I'm rolling.
Received on 2013-05-14 16:48:04 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.