Is there any insight to update the projected (or goal) release date for 1.8
as right now it indicates "Q4 2012 *(Unconfirmed)*" which has come and
gone...
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de> wrote:
> rhuijben_at_apache.org wrote on Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:00:55 -0000:
> > Author: rhuijben
> > Date: Thu Mar 28 12:00:54 2013
> > New Revision: 1462060
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1462060
> > Log:
> > * roadmap.html
> > Mark the profiling step of new apis as completed. Over the last few
> months
> > I profiled all the cases I profiled before (status, update, merge,
> copy,
> > etc. etc.) and found no new problems.
> >
>
> To clarify, did you profile only new-in-1.8 libsvn_client APIs, or did
> you profile new APIs in other libraries too?
>
> > Of course we can always improve further, but the original db query
> work I
> > did earlier in 1.8 development and the verifications added back then
> now
> > show a lot of improvement over 1.7 and no recent regressions.
> >
> > I call this done for 1.8. And if we find and solve new problems we can
> try
> > to backport them.
> >
> > Modified:
> > subversion/site/publish/roadmap.html
> >
> > Modified: subversion/site/publish/roadmap.html
> > URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/site/publish/roadmap.html?rev=1462060&r1=1462059&r2=1462060&view=diff
> >
> ==============================================================================
> > --- subversion/site/publish/roadmap.html (original)
> > +++ subversion/site/publish/roadmap.html Thu Mar 28 12:00:54 2013
> > @@ -371,9 +371,9 @@ numbering, compatibility, and deprecatio
> > <td>Review private APIs (including APIs used by
> <tt>subversion/svn*/</tt>),
> > and determine which of them should be promoted to public.</td>
> > </tr>
> > - <tr class="task-level-2 not-started">
> > + <tr class="task-level-2 completed">
> > <td class="task-name">API performance analysis</td>
> > - <td class="task-status">Not Started</td>
> > + <td class="task-status">Completed</td>
> > <td>Profile the new APIs to determine which can/should be
> optimized.</td>
> > </tr>
> > <tr class="task-level-1 in-progress">
> >
> >
>
Received on 2013-05-13 15:19:28 CEST