On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 05:32:05PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> RC-1 was effectively vetoed by the svnserve threading problems which are
> being actively fixed now. We cannot release that tarball.
Ah, I wasn't aware of that.
I thought we were still going to release that tarball anyway.
> > Are you worried that people will still be busy testing 1.8.0-rc1
> > next week, so they won't have time to review STATUS on 1.7.x?
> > And I don't see why we couldn't prepare two releases somewhat
> > concurrently. Not that I want people to hurry unnecessarily.
> > But it won't hurt to have a 1.7.10 tarball people could sign
> > if they wanted to, would it?
> It would be far better to let people concentrate on those fixes than to
> distract them with 1.7.10. There's no rush that I detect.
I still don't really see why this is a huge distraction (I've done
both 1.8.x and 1.7.x voting during the last few days). But fair enough.
Received on 2013-05-10 17:44:46 CEST